|
without so much as a backward glance,
suede have earned themselves a place in the pantheon of great
british pop groups. and, like all good things before them, they
seemed to come out of nowhere. two and a half years ago they were
just another low-rent-glam-rock group looking for a place to play,
just another bunch of naïve hopefuls named after a fabric (felt,
corduroy, denim, etc.). then, almost overnight, after a few good
live reviews and the releases of their first single – a shrill
declaration of independence called the “the drowners” – that
music press descended upon them like a pack of rapacious
bloodhounds. in just six months suede – purveyors of modern
glam-rock – got the covers of the melody maker, nme,
q, select and almost every other music magazine in
britain. there were 20 covers in all. although the press were more
than keen, with hindsight it was deemed to be a highly orchestrated
campaign by the group’s publicist, john best. so successful was
best’s assault thought to be that last year he won the music week
award for press campaign of 1993. the judges said it “took suede
from obscurity to being hailed as the best band of the year”.
given their enthusiasm it is likely that the music press would have
written about the band anyway.
these four skinny white boys were called
the last great british pop group, the saviours of rock, the finest
british pop group since the smiths… four louche young men who
have, according to one particularly smitten rock journalist,
“single-handedly revitalized our faith in sexy, provocative
english guitar pop”. they has so much coverage that one began to
suspect that very little else was happening in the british music
scene. this was not altogether true. even considering the tyranny of
youth, these days pop phenomena are few and far between, and suede
arrived at a time when the other icons of modern cutting-edge pop
– morrissey, the stone roses, primal scream, etc, - were absent
from the scene.
|